Larry Grathwohl

In a sane and just world, Larry Grathwohlwould be recognized as a true American hero. His successful effort, as an FBI informant, to infiltrate the terrorist group the Weather Underground and to attempt to bring them to justice would be common knowledge and his book about his experiences would a best selling, making Grathwohl a wealthy man.images

In a sane and just world, terrorists and murderers like Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dorhn would be spending their lives in prison, justly reviled by the nation they sought to destroy. Their protegé, one Barack Obama, would not dare to enter politics for fear that an alert media would expose his sordid and radical past.

We do not live in a sane and just world. In this insane and unjust world we do live in, heroes like Larry Grathwohl live and die in obscurity, their work largely unrecognized. Villains like Ayers and Dorhn do not pay the price for their crimes but are treated as heroes by the Left wing media and Hollywood. Fawning movies by A list celebrities white wash their murderous pasts, implying that they were just a little bit over excited at times, not crazed radicals who were perfectly willing to see tens of million of their fellow Americans perish in concentration camps.

Larry Grathwohl is now in a saner and more just world, having left this one yesterday. He has gone to his reward for his heroism. One can hope that the villains he exposed will soon face the justice they deserve.

Hammer Control

English: Standard Hammer
Deadly weapon


According to the FBI more people are killed with hammers and clubs than rifles. I read this article about it at


According to the FBI annual crime statistics, the number of murders committed annually with hammers and clubs far outnumbers the number of murders committed with a rifle.

This is an interesting fact, particularly amid the Democrats’ feverish push to ban many different rifles, ostensibly to keep us safe of course.

However, it appears the zeal of Sens. like Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) is misdirected. For in looking at the FBI numbers from 2005 to 2011, the number of murders by hammers and clubs consistently exceeds the number of murders committed with a rifle.

Think about it: In 2005, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 445, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 605. In 2006, the number of murders committed with a rifle was 438, while the number of murders committed with hammers and clubs was 618.

And so the list goes, with the actual numbers changing somewhat from year to year, yet the fact that more people are killed with blunt objects each year remains constant.

For example, in 2011, there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs.

While the FBI makes is clear that some of the “murder by rifle” numbers could be adjusted up slightly, when you take into account murders with non-categorized types of guns, it does not change the fact that their annual reports consistently show more lives are taken each year with these blunt objects than are taken with Feinstein’s dreaded rifle.

Another interesting fact: According to the FBI, nearly twice as many people are killed by hands and fists each year than are killed by murderers who use rifles.


We have to adopt reasonable restrictions on the possession and use of hammers and clubs. I suggest that only registered contractors be permitted to own hammers. It may be a bit inconvenient if you need to hammer a nail or something, but we must do something to end this horror.


By the way, I am almost afraid to post this. It is just possible that Mayor Bloomberg or Diane Feinstein will happen upon this post and take it seriously.


And since I am talking about gun control, I might as well mention this article by Dylan Byers at Politico. He observes that the conversation over gun control sparked by the Sandy Hook shooting entirely ceased after two weeks.


On the day of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn., we published a chart showing the Sisyphean nature of the national gun control discussion. In the immediate aftermath of a shooting, such as the one that took place in Aurora, Colo., mentions of the term “gun control” spike in the news media. In a matter of days, that discussion all but disappears.

This time was supposed to be different. “It is hard to believe this will not be a watershed moment when we start to talk about, deal with and even perhaps legislate on guns,” ABC News’s Z. Byron Wolf wrote. He was one among many in the media who believed the momentum for gun control legislation was strong enough to turn the tide on a familiar pattern.

Blame it on the fiscal cliff, blame it on Christmas, blame it on our ability to forget, but the national discussion about gun control has once again ebbed. Mentions of the term “gun control” on television, in newspapers, and in online media are down to pre-Sandy Hook levels, according to the Nexis database.


Here is the graph.




The reason the discussion was dropped was because the conversation wasn’t going the way the media wanted it to go.