A hundred years after the War of the Rebellion, or the War for Independence as it is called in the Confederate States of America, the South has developed into a race neutral society with slavery long nationalized and under the control of the notorious Ministry of State Servitude. The new, liberal Confederate President Jimmy Carter is seeking to end the long cold war with the North and improve relations with Kaiser Frederick, ruler of the most powerful nation in the world, the German Empire.
Against this historical backdrop three people, U. S. intelligence agent Northrop McLean, young beautiful Confederate exile Ansley Mason, and Underground Railroad conductor Thaddeus Lynch must learn to work together to prevent a conspiracy that could destroy both nations.
This, in brief, is the plot of Peter Pauze’salternate history thriller Crossing the Line. While the historical premise seems wildly implausible (I’ll accept the Confederacy’s eventually ending slavery under international opinion, but considering that it took federal intervention to end Jim Crow I simply cannot believe that the descendants of slaves and slave-owners would be treated as equals in a country that seceded precisely to keep those slaves in bondage), but the story is exciting with a plot twist every chapter. Then, towards the end the reader learns that none of the main characters is precisely who they said they were with double and triple agents revealed.
That, in fact, is the only weakness in the story, the way in which too much is uncovered in the last chapter. Still, the plot leads up to the climax fairly well, with enough hints along the way, that this is not a deadly weakness. I can recommend Crossing the Line as an alternate history thriller equal to any that Harry Turtledove has written and I hope that Peter Pauze will be encouraged to write more.
Darn those awful, racist teabaggers! They elected governors who actually know how to grow economies and create jobs. Here are the awful details at Big Government.
In 2010, influenced by the Tea Party and its focus on fiscal issues, 17 states elected Republican governors. And, according to an Examiner.com analysis, every one of those states saw a drop in their unemployment rates since January of 2011.
Since January of 2011, here is how much the unemployment rate declined in each of the 17 states that elected Republican governors in 2010, according to theExaminer:
Kansas – 6.9% to 6.1% = a decline of 0.8 [percentage points (11.6 percent)]
Maine – 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of 0.6 [percentage points (7.5 percent)]
Michigan – 10.9% to 8.5% = a decline of [2.4 percentage points (22 percent)]
New Mexico – 7.7% to 6.7% = a decline of [1.0 percentage points (13 percent)]
Oklahoma – 6.2% to 4.8% = a decline of [1.4 percentage points – (22.6 percent)]
Pennsylvania – 8.0% to 7.4% = a decline of [.6 percentage points (7.5 percent)]
Tennessee – 9.5% to 7.9% = a decline of [1.6 percentage points(16.8 percent)]
Wisconsin – 7.7% to 6.8% = a decline of [0.9 percentage points (11.9 percent)]
Wyoming – 6.3% to 5.2% = a decline of [1.1 percentage points (17.5 percent)]
Alabama – 9.3% to 7.4% = a decline of [1.9 percentage points (20.4 percent)]
Georgia – 10.1% to 8.9% = a decline of [1.2 percentage points (11.9 percent)]
South Carolina – 10.6% to 9.1% = a decline of [1.5 percentage points (14.2 percent)]
South Dakota – 5.0% to 4.3% = a decline of [0.7 percentage points (14 percent)]
Florida – 10.9% to 8.6% = a decline of [2.3 percentage points (21 percent)]
Nevada – 13.8% to 11.6% = a decline of [2.2 percentage points (15.9 percent)]
Iowa – 6.1% to 5.1% = a decline of [1.0 percentage points (16.4 percent)]
Ohio – 9.0% to 7.3% = a decline of [1.7 percentage points (18.9 percent)]
This was not the case for states that elected Democrats in 2010. For instance, the unemployment rate in New York actually went up. On average, states that elected Republican governors in 2010 saw their unemployment rates decrease at a faster clip than states that elected Democrats and the unemployment rate at the national level did.
This is yet another example of how the so-called “blue state” model is not working.
*an earlier version of this article incorrectly relied on an analysis that mistook a decline in percentage points for a percent decline.