Penn State Scandal

I haven’t been following this story very closely and I am afraid that I may have some of the details wrong. My understanding is that back in 2000 a janitor witnessed Assistant Coach Jerry Sandusky committing an indecent act with a young boy in the showers. He told his supervisor and nothing was done. Another man witnessed a similar incident two years later and reported it with a similar lack of result.

Perhaps I shouldn’t judge these men. I am not at all sure what I would have done in a similar situation. It is easy enough to say that maybe they should have followed the matter up. I would like to think that I would call the police, immediately. Maybe even whipping out my cell phone and calling 911 on the spot.

I wonder what Coach Paterno and Atheltic Director Curley were thinking when they let that man go on abusing children. Surely they didn’t really believe that just forbidding him to take any more boys into the building was solving the problem. I also wonder what is going through the mind of someone like Sandusky when he is molesting a child. I would like to think that if I had any such inclinations I would seek some sort of help. I would hope that I would stay away from temptation by avoiding children.

 

Well that clears the matter up. He isn’t a pedophile. He just likes to shower with young boys.

NYPD Clears OWS

And it’s about time too. Here is the story in the New York Post.

The NYPD arrested 200 protesters as they moved in on Zuccotti Park early this morning and cleared out the thousands of Occupy Wall Street protesters who had taken over the space for nearly two months.

Mayor Bloomberg, who called the decision to boot the protesters “mine and mine alone,” said protesters would be allowed back into the Lower Manhattan park but not with their tents and sleeping bags.

I don’t have any problem with protests. I supported the Tea Party protests. But, there is a problem when people start camping out in parks for weeks on end and annoy the people who live in the area. There is a real problem when the camps become havens for criminal activity and a public health hazard.

I don’t think that Mayor Bloomberg comes off at all well in his dealings with these people. The first duty of any public official is to maintain order and the rule of law. By failing to properly handle the protesters when they started to become unruly, he and too many other sympathetic mayors effectively abdicated their duty, and, they allowed the problem to become that much harder to deal with.

By the way, I think the OWS protesters should be forced to clean up their mess. At the very least, they should pay the costs.

In Decline

Victor Davis Hanson doesn’t believe it, and neither should we. In this column in National Review Online, Hanson explains why he doesn’t believe that the US is in a state of inevitable decline.

We are in a fresh round of declinism — understandably, after borrowing nearly $5 trillion in less than three years and having very little to show for it. Pundit strives with op-ed writer to find the latest angle on America’s descent: We are broke; we are poorly educated; we are uncompetitive; we have gone soft; our political institutions are broken; and on and on. The Obama administration does its part, with sloganeering like “reset,” “lead from behind,” “post-American world,” and America as exceptional only to the degree that all nations feel exceptional.

This is not new. In the late 1930s, the New Germany and its autobahns were supposed to show Depression-plagued America how national will could unite a people to do great things. After all, they had Triumph of the Will Nuremberg rallies; we still had Hoovervilles. They flew sleek Me-109s; we flew lumbering cloth-covered Brewster Buffaloes. We, the victors of a world war, were determined never to repeat it; they, the losers, were eager to try it again.

In the 1950s, Sputnik and the vast spread of Communism through the postcolonial world were supposed proof of the efficiency and social justice of Communism and the rot of capitalism — the inevitable denouement of the 20th century. Sputnik soared, even as our ex-Nazi scientists could not seem to make our rockets work. They had Uncle Ho and Che; we had Diem and the Shah. Their guys wore peasant garb and long hair; ours, sunglasses and gold braid.

By the 1970s and 1980s, Japan Inc. was the next new paradigm of the post-American world. Even American “experts” lectured us on the need to adopt Japanese-like partnerships between corporations and government. They made Accords and Camrys; we made Pintos and Gremlins. We played golf at Pebble Beach; they owned it.

As Japan faded, the next great hope followed in the 1990s when the EU captivated the American Left. The Europeans’ loud moral declarations, their pacifism, cradle-to-grave entitlements, trains à grande vitesse — all of that was what a backward America should strive for. They crafted the Kyoto Agreement; we drove gas-guzzling Tahoes and Yukons. Their strong Euros bought in New York what our weak dollars could not in Paris.

Where are all those supposedly post-American systems now? Fascism was crushed; Communism imploded; Japan is aging and shrinking; the European Union is cracking apart. But, of course, there is China, which, we are told, is the next new replacement for America — a country with enormous demographic problems, a reputation for crude diplomacy and an outlaw approach to international commercial agreements, censored media and a complete lack of transparency, vast inequality, environmental catastrophes, and no stable political system to transition a rural peasantry into a postindustrial affluent citizenry. No matter — our jet-setting elites still whine that they have shiny new airports; we have grungy LAX and JFK. They have sleek bullet trains; we, creaking Amtrak.

If we are in a state of decline, than most of the world is declining even faster. America does have its problems and they are serious but I don’t think any of them are unsolvable, nor would I willingly exchange our problems for those of Europe or China.

Hanson concludes by noting America’s almost unique ability to reinvent itself with every generation.

Why does the United States continue to reinvent itself, generation after generation, to adapt to a radically changing world? Our ancestral Constitution checks the abuse of power and guarantees the freedom of the individual — all in transparent fashion. And our habits and customs that have evolved over two centuries are grounded in the human desire to be judged by what we do rather than what we look like, or under what circumstances we were born — a fact that explains our vibrant and sometime crass popular culture. The essence of our culture is constant self-critique and reexamination — a messy self-audit that so often fools both ourselves and our critics into thinking that our loud paranoia about decline, rather than our far quieter effort to arrest it, is the real story of America

In short, the 21st century will remain American.

I hope he is right about that. I think that a world without America as the leading power is likely to be a very bad place.

Related articles