Super Earth Found

HD 189733 has a Jupiter-class planet in a tigh...
Image via Wikipedia

I’ve always been a science fiction fan so the idea of planets orbiting other stars seemed perfectly natural to me. I never imagined, though, that astronomers would be able to detect these planets within my life time. I thought we would have to wait centuries until warp drive or something was invented. It turns out,  though that in recent years astronomers have been able to refine their techniques not only to detect such planets, but even to learn quite a bit about them. At first they could only detect massive Jupiter sized planets but now it seems that they can study even Earth sized worlds.

With that in mind, there is this item from Yahoo News. It would seem that some 16 “super-earths” or rocky planets more massive than ours have been detected.

The newfound haul of alien planets includes 16 super-Earths, which are potentially rocky worlds that are more massive than our planet. One in particular – called HD 85512 b – has captured astronomers’ attention because it orbits at the edge of its star’s habitable zone, suggesting conditions could be ripe to support life.

The exoplanet findings came from observations from the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher instrument, or HARPS. The HARPS spectrograph is part of ESO’s 11.8-foot (3.6-meter) telescope at the La Silla Observatory in Chile. [

“The harvest of discoveries from HARPS has exceeded all expectations and includes an exceptionally rich population of super-Earths and Neptune-type planets hosted by stars very similar to our sun,” HARPS team leader Michel Mayor of the University of Geneva in Switzerland said in a statement. “And even better — the new results show that the pace of discovery is accelerating.”

The potentially habitable super-Earth, officially called HD 85512 b, is estimated to be only 3.6 times more massive than Earth, and its parent star is located about 35 light-years away, making it relatively nearby. HD 85512 b was found to orbit at the edge of its star’s habitable zone, which is a narrow region in which the distance is just right that liquid water could exist given the right conditions.

“This is the lowest-mass confirmed planet discovered by the radial velocity method that potentially lies in the habitable zone of its star, and the second low-mass planet discovered by HARPS inside the habitable zone,” said exoplanet habitability expert Lisa Kaltenegger, of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany and Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Boston.

Further analysis of HD 85512 b and the other newfound exoplanets will be able to determine more about the potential existence of water on the surface.

“I think we’re in for an incredibly exciting time,” Kaltenegger told reporters in a briefing today (Sept. 12). “We’re not just going out there to discover new continents — we’re actually going out there to discover brand new worlds.”

 The HARPS spectrograph is designed to detect tiny radial velocity signals induced by planets as small as Earth if they orbit close to their star.

If you find water and if the planet is far enough away from its star for that water to be liquid, than you have a good chance of life. On the other hand a planet 3.6 times as massive as the Earth will have 3.6 times more gravitational pull which wouldn’t make it very pleasant to live on. As the team continues their search and develops better equipment and techniques, maybe they’ll be able to find smaller planets we could live on. We still need warp drive though.

The last one is fun. I miss seeing the Weekly World News in grocery stores, etc.

8 thoughts on “Super Earth Found”

  1. Three point six times the mass doesn’t mean 3.6 times the gravity. In fact, if you crushed the moon and condensed it, you could get a planetary object with the same gravitational pull as Earth. I believe they found one roughly 4 times the mass of Earth, and yet the gravitational pull was calculated to be less than double that of our own planet. Humanity could adapt to that kind of a gravity load.


    1. Do you happen to know how to calculate that? We could adapt to heavier gravity but it wouldn’t be comfortable. I can imagine there would be health problems associated with prolonged exposure to heavy gravity, just as there are from weightlessness, though I suppose if we had the technology to travel interstellar space we would be able to take care of them easily enough.


  2. Pingback:
  3. I have no idea how to calculate it, but from what I remember gravity has more to do with density than with mass. If the mass is spread out over a large enough area, there’s almost no gravitational pull.

    The health problems are largely our bodies attempting to adapt, and failing. If we don’t have the technology to handle some very alien things, we will have to rely on adaptation to get to knew worlds, which will end with new and distinct human subspecies.


    1. I looked it up and you’re right. If the planet with 3.6 times Earth’s mass had Earth’s radius than the surface gravity would be 3.6 times Earth’s. But, if the planet were also 3.6 times Earth’s radius than the gravity at its surface would actually be less than Earth’s.


  4. So in all likelihood, those planets are both larger and more massive than Earth, meaning that they’ll have more gravity, but the difference wouldn’t be as extreme as the difference between Earth and free fall.


Questions, comments, praise

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: