Archive for May 3rd, 2011

Suicidal Idiots

May 3, 2011

Vladimir Lenin is said to have referred to the well-meaning Western Liberals who uncritically supported the Soviet Union as “useful idiots”. Somehow these people managed not to see the tyranny and misery of Communism. If Western liberals were often useful idiots then these Israeli liberals are suicidal idiots. This article, which I learned about through Pajamas Media, tells of left-wing activists who met in front of the building where David Ben-Gurion declared Israeli independence in 1948, in order to welcome the independence of a Palestinian state.

Actress Hannah Maron read a statement which included:

We have gathered here today, on April 21, 2011, to welcome the expected declaration of independence of the Palestinian state, Israel’s neighbor, with our borders of independence – which came into being at the end of the War of Independence in 1949 – the borders known as the ’67 borders,” a document drawn up by the left-wing activists says.

“The independence of both states strengthens each other. It is a moral and existential need and the basis for the possibility of good neighborly relations.”

The document adds, “We call on the citizens of Israel, the Knesset, the government, citizens of the world and their governments to recognize two states, in which the right to self-definition must be expressed by

both peoples as well as the general principles of democracy and equality.”

How can these people not be aware that both the PLO and Hamas wish to destroy Israel? Are they really so ignorant, or they indeed suicidal?

Back during the Holocaust, were there Jews who insisted that their fellow Jews cooperate with the Nazi in their own extermination in order to have peace?

Some More About Osama

May 3, 2011

I’m sorry, but it’s all I can think of right now, so I’ll just highlight a few stories that caught my eye.

Obama doesn’t seem to have gotten any bounce in his approval ratings.

While the public lauds the president’s performance killing Bin Laden, he got no overall bounce in a new Newsweek/Daily Beast poll. Also: Obama vs. Bush on terror and Obama vs. Trump in 2012.

How much overall boost did President Obama get from the capture of Osama Bin Laden? None, according to an exclusive Newsweek / Daily Beast poll encompassing 1,200 American adults, conducted in the two days immediately before the president’s Sunday announcement about the terrorist leader, and then the two days immediately after.

Specifically, Americans like the way he handled the situation, giving him strong results in strength and decision-making (55 percent now term him a strong leader overall, and 63 percent do so in the area of terrorism). Yet he did not get any overall bump in terms of approval rating, or electoral support. His approval rate was unchanged—48 approve, 49 disapprove, both before and after. There was also no statistical change in whether Obama deserves reelection—40/48 before, 39/49 after.

This doesn’t seem quite fair for Obama. If the mission had failed he would have gotten blamed by everyone, s0 it’s only fair to give him some credit now. But, as the article mentions, people are probably more fixated on the poor economy right now.

On the other hand, it seems to have taken him sixteen hours to have made up his mind to go ahead. This would seem to be a  “no-brainer” but then he had to have been concerned about the risks

And, of course we have the usual carping:

From Der Speigel:

Was Bin Laden’s Killing Legal?

and the UN:

UN rights boss asks US for facts on bin Laden killing

GENEVA, May 3 (Reuters) – The United Nations’ top human rights official called on the United States on Tuesday to give the U.N. details about Osama bin Laden’s killing and said that all counter-terrorism operations must respect international law.

But Navi Pillay, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said that the al Qaeda leader, killed in a U.S. operation in Pakistan, had committed crimes against humanity as self-confessed mastermind of “the most appalling acts of terrorism”, including the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on America.

It was always clear that taking bin Laden alive was likely to be difficult, she said, noting that U.S. authorities had stated that they intended to arrest him if possible.

“This was a complex operation and it would be helpful if we knew the precise facts surrounding his killing. The United Nations has consistently emphasised that all counter-terrorism acts must respect international law,” Pillay said in a statement issued in response to a Reuters request.

Is that some kind of joke? The UN has no moral authority whatever on the issue of human rights.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 401 other followers

%d bloggers like this: